TERKINI
🌍 Global coverage 24/7 • 🏯 East Asia: China, Japan, Korea • 🛕 South Asia: India • 🏰 Europe • 🗽 Americas • 🌍 Africa • 🕌 Middle East • 🇵🇸 Palestine Solidarity • 📖 This Day in World History •
This article is an AI translation from the original language.
🌍 World

Is the G7 Listening to the Global South?

Geopolitical tensions are becoming more evident with the struggle for influence between the G7, BRICS, and new world powers — a reality that directly impacts the Palestinian people and Global South countries.

18 Jun 20262 min read9 viewsBy Redaksi MeridianAl Jazeera
Is the G7 Listening to the Global South?

Power Struggles in the Midst of a Global Crisis

In the context of deepening global power imbalances, the G7 group — consisting of the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and Canada — now faces serious challenges from alternative blocs such as BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) and other developing countries. As reported by Al Jazeera in the documentary series *Counting the Cost*, this dynamic is not just about economics or diplomacy, but also about representation: who has a voice in determining global policies that affect the lives of millions in the Global South.

Palestinian Voices in an Overlooked Space

For the Palestinian people, the absence of representation in the G7 forum — and their inability to convey their narratives directly within major institutions — reflects structural injustice in the international system. Although issues such as occupation, the Gaza blockade, and ongoing human rights violations remain focal points in UN reports and human rights organizations, G7 responses are often selective and inconsistent with international law principles. Instead, BRICS cooperation and initiatives like the New Development Bank open up alternative spaces for technical and diplomatic support to marginalized countries.

A New World Order: Hopes and Challenges

Recent developments, such as Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt joining BRICS as full members, show an inevitable shift in power. However, for the Palestinian people, hope is not only about institutional change, but also about practical solidarity: voting support at the UN, diplomatic pressure against international law violations, and access to unconditional political aid mechanisms. As emphasized in Al Jazeera's analysis, 'listening' is not enough — what is needed is principled action that respects sovereignty, the right to self-determination, and historical justice.